Announcement Podcast Paroxysm talks NBA with SI.com's Lee Jenkins ×

Have You Seen This Man?

You haven't even finished reading the caption and this picture already annoys you, doesn't it?!

Have you ever met someone so grating, so irritating to be around that the mere sight, no thought of them physically repulses you? But to complicate things a little bit, you’re not socially allowed to dislike that person so you can’t even say anything without a referendum being made on your character?

Ladies and gentleman, I present to you ‘Fireman Ed.’ Fireman Ed is a drunken, loud-mouthed idiot who, those select group of cretins who proudly call themselves Jets-fans excluded, annoys the rest of us unimaginably. The man is ostensibly an imbecile, which is to say I’ve never met him and he may be a very nice guy, but he really nails the part of an imbecile on national TV every Sunday. Believe me, I’d be more colorful if I could. But he’s a New York City Fireman. So now just for denigrating him I could be accused of having questionable character.

My problem with this guy is that he seemingly travels everywhere with the Jets and right when you’d least like to see his ugly, unpalatable mug on television he shows up anyways, spelling one of the only words he knows for everyone else in his merry band of idiots. You know you’ve seen him in Miami, screaming in Dolphins fans’ faces and just generally reducing the quality of the game for an entire section.

Now the beautiful part of this country is that there are laws that prevent us from discriminating against people. Unfortunately, that also applies to not allowing this guy into the stadium on the basis that he’s an insufferably loud Jets fan when he inevitably shows up to shout and spell on Sunday night . In order for the Dolphins to prevent him from coming in and annoying thousands of people he would have to do something like… I don’t know, assault another fan or something. And surely Fireman Ed, who is a good guy because he’s a fireman after all, wouldn’t assault somebody at a football game

Oh wait, Fireman Ed has now been charged with assaulting a fan at an NFL stadium. Who did he assault, you ask? A Giants fan! Now I could understand if Fireman Ed had lashed out in a brief moment of clarity. If he had looked up from his drunken stupor for a few brief seconds and realized that he had become a caricature or that the entire meaning of his existence could be reduced to leading an elementary school cheer in front of a bunch of drunken miscreants as he roots for a franchise that peaked during the AFL and has the 7th lowest winning percentage of all active teams since the merger. If he had reacted angrily to that epiphany and just lashed out at the closest person to him I might understand. But Ed lashed out at a Giants fan who was cheering too loudly against him. Now I tend to think Giants fans are nice people because Jason Taylor told me so. You remember when JT said:

There are nice people in New York, they’re Giants fans.

Well, I’m prone to believe him. All kidding aside though, why would one of the least likable people in the entire NFL, a man despised by fan-bases the league over, actually give teams an excuse to keep him out? It may seem like a tenuous claim, but security personnel at Sun Life Stadium really should refuse ‘Fireman Ed’ Anzalone admission on Sunday based entirely on principle. Ed Anzalone is accused of assaulting an opposing fan at his own stadium. Legally, the Dolphins should have an obligation to prevent him from entering their stadium, endangering their fans. A man who currently stands accused and has been charged with assaulting a rival fan presents an actual security issue at this game. If he attacked someone during the preseason as they opened a new stadium (on what should have been an amicable night on all fronts), I doubt he’s going to use better judgment during a heated rivalry game as he’s surrounded by potentially hostile Dolphins fans. There is a precedent for his behavior now. And quite frankly, legally, knowing what they do the Dolphins organization could be held partially liable should Anzalone be allowed admission and happen to assault someone else.

Plus wouldn’t it make you feel good to know that somewhere, even if just in one isolated incident, that a Jet actually would be held accountable for his actions? Think about that as you watch Braylon Edwards start the second quarter with a reception…

Want more from Phin Phanatic?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • marcash

    Hmmmmmm, so the Dolphins hold their players responsible for their actions? Can we say RONNIE BROWN, I’ll think about that as I watch him take a handoff in the FIRST quarter of the game.

  • cuchulainn

    You should really get your facts straight, or at least look into a matter before you start posting about something you know little or nothing about…

    From a another post on this forum:

    You also have to take into account the circumstances surrounding each incident and the character of each (person).

    Ronnie was supposedly pulled over for not signaling a lane change, and while he passed the breathalyzer test in which he was within the legal limit, he failed the “sobriety test” administered on the scene by the officer (subjective analysis). Ronnie was coming from an anniversary party thrown for his parents in the off season, not a night of drunken debauchery. This is also his first ever arrest and it is still being legally contended.

    Edwards was stopped in the wee hours of the morning coming from a night of partying with friends and fellow teammates. He failed the breathalyzer test by twice the legal limit. He was also in violation of state and local laws governing illegal equipment on his Land Rover with the darkness of his window tint.

    This was NOT Edwards first run in with the law, or with the team. He is a repeat offender and considered childish, selfish, and irresponsible by even his own teammates…

  • Jay

    When Ronnie was caught it was also the offseason. Not Tuesday morning on what could be the week of the biggest game of the jets pathetic season. Also Braylon should know not to drive drunk because he was the one who was partying with Stallworth on the night that he killed that poor guy driving home drunk. After seeing what his friend went threw wouldnt he have the brains to not follow in his footsteps.

  • http://www.marcash.com marcash

    Driving drunk is driving drunk. It’s OK that Ronnie Brown failed a sobriety test & received a DWI because he was actually pulled not signaling.

    Edwards blew too high but, he was only pulled for what appeared to be too dark of tinting on his windows at 5am!

    Same circumstances..Bench Brown & I’ll be find with benching Edwards…same crime committed by each player!!!

    • Deof Movestofca

      Sorry, but first time offenders tend to deserve to be treated differently from habitual offenders. If both players are guilty, they both deserve to be punished, but not punished equally.

    • Patrik Nohe

      I can tell ya as somebody who works in the legal profession in Florida that if Braylon Edwards had been arrested at .016 here, that’s considered a felony DUI arrest. Ronnie Brown’s was a misdemeanor. The law here differentiates, nice philosophical argument, but legally it has no credibility.

      Ronnie also didn’t just get his second DUI the week of a game at 5AM in a city where you literally can’t spit without hitting a taxi cab.

  • http://www.marcash.com marcash

    Ummm, this Braylon Edwrds FIRST DWI, do your homeowrk. Also, in the state I live, even at a .16 a first time offender is still a misdemeanor & would render nothing more than probation, no worse punishment than Ronnie Brown! What you guys are expressing is a double standard!

  • Patrik Nohe

    Oh my bad, he’s on probation for AGGRAVATED ASSAULT. Not DWI. You’re right, he is a good guy. Good character.

  • Patrik Nohe

    And if the state you live in is NYC yes you can be charged with Felony-DWI a .016 on a first offense. That already qualifies as an aggravated DWI and when there are compounding factors (like for instance he violated the terms of his probation for a violent offense) the charges can, and with precedent, be moved up to felony DWI.

    And it would be a double standard if Ronnie was in serious risk of facing jail time. But he’s not. Braylon on the other hand could face up to a year in jail in New York and may have to to prison in Ohio. Pretty big difference between the two.

  • James

    HATTERSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS