Is Roger Goodell Good or Bad for the NFL? (poll)

The Most Powerful Man in Sports

The most powerful man in sports! That is what many say about Mr. Roger Goodell. Are they right? Is it correct to say the “boss” of the most popular sport in America is also the most powerful? In a word, yes!

It is ironic that Roger got a degree in economics while in college and now heads what is arguably one of the last monopolies on earth. NASCAR is the only other one I can think of. Like the France family in NASCAR, what Roger says is law. There is no “supreme court” to hear your argument. His word is law. PERIOD!

Given the NFL commisioner has such authority, as do the commishs of other major sports, it is important that such a responsibility and trust be placed with the proper person. Is it? Is Mr. Goodell good or bad for the sport that we all love? Regardless which of the 32 teams you are a fan of, Roger has a huge affect on your team.

Let’s take a brief moment and look at the history of Mr. Goodell. As I said, his degree is in economics. Until I did some research on him during the lockout negotiations, I mistakenly thought he was an attorney, although with all of the new rules and laws he has helped institute since becoming commissioner, you could not tell it. Here is a breakdown of the good, bad & other.

THE GOOD

  • Roger started out as an intern and worked his way all the way to the top. You have to give him credit for that and recognize he has experience at all levels of the business.
  • I believe his intentions are pure. One of his first goals was to “clean up” the league of thugs. I think he has made considerable progress in that area.
  • We have to give ample credit to Roger for his role in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) negotiations. When a league’s union contract expires is a lousy time to be the commissioner. I have no doubt without Goodell, the season would have been severely shortened or canceled altogether.
  • To become the commish, Goodell was  voted in by his peers and unanimously approved by the team owners. This sounds like a great idea for team ownership as well.

THE BAD

  • Critics of Goodell, and they are out there, say that Goodell has been inconsistent in penalizing players for infractions. I think there is reasonable evidence to substaniate those claims. It appears Goodell has been particularly harsh on some, others have gone unpenalized or barely slapped.
  • Being only human and growing up and supporting New York teams, it is only reasonable to believe there is a certain amount of biasness in making decisions regarding his “hometown” teams.

THE OTHER

  • Goodell is a huge proponnent of expanding the NFL out of the United States. The London game and the Bills playing one game in Toronto has become an annual event and sells out in mere minutes. Games have also been played in Mexico. I listed this under “other”, but if you are a season ticket holder of the home team of a team playing out of the country, it is a horrible thing. The NFL still collects your revenue for that home game that you likely were unable to attend.
  • Goodell is also determined to take drug testing to a higher level. Is this good or bad? It depends on how it is instituted and governed, therefore is listed under “other”.
  • I cannot be certain how much influence Goodell has in making rule changes, or the enforcement of said rules, but this could very well be listed under “bad”. Regardless, the NFL has rightfully earned it’s new name of the “No Fun League”. Penalizing  players for 5 second celebrations is absurd. Calling a roughing the passer penalty for a defender jumping up and trying to block a pass only to come down and inadvertanitly hitting the QB’s helmet is downright assinine. Whoever is responsible for these ridiculous rules is most certainly bad for the sport. By the way, thanks to the enforcement of “frivolous” penalties and extensive reviews, the typical 60 minute football game now takes well over 3 hours.

Before you vote whether Roger Goodell is good or bad, keep in mind it could be much worse. Just how much is up for debate.  Look no further than NBA commish David Stern or worse yet, MLB commish Bud Selig. The NFL has been very fortunate in it’s past leadership with commishioners like Paul Tagliabue and Pete Rozelle. The jury is still out what legacy Goodell will leave.

Fins4ever!~

Is commissioner Roger Goodell good or bad for the NFL?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Topics: Bud Selig, David Stern, Roger Goodell

Want more from Phin Phanatic?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Strongguard70

    I agree with you on the fact that he had a lot to do with the lockout being resolved. However, the league is not only soft, it’s just not football anymore. Goodell is concerned with one thing and that’s ratings, and what brings ratings, shoot outs. He’s done everything in his power to limit defenses, can’t touch the qb, no hits over the middle of the field which means you have to let the guy catch it (I believe this had some affect on Tyrone culvers missed tackle on cruz because you can clearly see him hesitate). Any type of jarring hit is an automatic penalty wether or not you hit helmet to helmet. And then you have nonsense penalties like taunting and excessive celebration. Why, because it hurts people’s feelings and they can’t control themselves. In my opinion he’s given refs to much power over the outcome of the game and no one holds them accountable for bad calls ie brandon marshall’s “pass interference” which effectively ended our chance of winning. You can say what you want, but momentum is a huge factor in any game( the world series proved that) and all of these calls are momentum shifting and potetialy game changing ( Andrew luck at USC penalty on the hit that resulted in a first down on there last drive to tie the game). As a former football player myself,( only played in high school not trying to make a big deal about it), I know how often referees will miss a call and that has some factor on my disdain for them. We see it every Sunday through replay that a lot more often than not the refs seem to be completely blind and this comes from goodells policy on how games are called. It just bothers me how anyone employed by the nfl will readily defend bogus calls

  • fins4ever

    @Strongguard70 I agree with you, but I think the ratings would take care of themselves…as long as they don’t screw the game up. I did an article earlier in the year (see link) which clearly showed through a poll that most fans are tired of changing the rules, usually in the name of safety.

    Head to head…Safety

    Moving the kickoff…safety

    Hitting the QB….Safety.

    Jimmeny crickets. Put a tu tu on these overpaid guys and put the QB in a bubble and call it a day!~

    In all fairness, it is difficult to say how much pressure the union puts on Goodell to try and protect it;’s players, even at the expense of the integrity of the game.

    http://phinphanatic.com/2011/08/24/has-the-nfl-diminished-the-game-in-the-name-of-safety/

TEAMFeed More Dolphins news from the Fansided Network

Hot on the Web From miamidolphins.com