<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vontae Davis And Sean Smith:  Were They The Best CB Tandem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phinphanatic.com/2012/01/22/vontae-davis-and-sean-smith-were-they-the-best-cb-tandem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phinphanatic.com/2012/01/22/vontae-davis-and-sean-smith-were-they-the-best-cb-tandem/</link>
	<description>A Miami Dolphins Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidNapier</title>
		<link>http://phinphanatic.com/2012/01/22/vontae-davis-and-sean-smith-were-they-the-best-cb-tandem/comment-page-1/#comment-16799</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidNapier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phinphanatic.com/?p=15167#comment-16799</guid>
		<description>ok, so using your &#039;formula&#039;.....26 tackles, 0 int, 9 pd&#039;s and 0 FF....that would make for a pretty poor CB, huh? Wrong, that was Revis Island in 2010.

It seems to me you picked a bunch of stats simply because they are the easiest to collate and compare, checking things like completion % against would have just taken too much work...

If you want to see how good a job a corner is doing just look and see how many passes come his way. Look and see how much help he gets, how he holds up in single coverage. Check the number of TD&#039;s he gives up, look at the completion % accross the range of passes. There are a whole host of other things to look at with the most important, as someone mentioned earlier, is on film.

One more point, I could just as easily say the reason other positions picked up int&#039;s is entirely down to QB&#039;s not wanting to challenge the corners, so let&#039;s give them the bulk of the credit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, so using your &#8216;formula&#8217;&#8230;..26 tackles, 0 int, 9 pd&#8217;s and 0 FF&#8230;.that would make for a pretty poor CB, huh? Wrong, that was Revis Island in 2010.</p>
<p>It seems to me you picked a bunch of stats simply because they are the easiest to collate and compare, checking things like completion % against would have just taken too much work&#8230;</p>
<p>If you want to see how good a job a corner is doing just look and see how many passes come his way. Look and see how much help he gets, how he holds up in single coverage. Check the number of TD&#8217;s he gives up, look at the completion % accross the range of passes. There are a whole host of other things to look at with the most important, as someone mentioned earlier, is on film.</p>
<p>One more point, I could just as easily say the reason other positions picked up int&#8217;s is entirely down to QB&#8217;s not wanting to challenge the corners, so let&#8217;s give them the bulk of the credit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: courtneymckoyy</title>
		<link>http://phinphanatic.com/2012/01/22/vontae-davis-and-sean-smith-were-they-the-best-cb-tandem/comment-page-1/#comment-16798</link>
		<dc:creator>courtneymckoyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phinphanatic.com/?p=15167#comment-16798</guid>
		<description>@dolphinsbuzztap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dolphinsbuzztap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lespaul</title>
		<link>http://phinphanatic.com/2012/01/22/vontae-davis-and-sean-smith-were-they-the-best-cb-tandem/comment-page-1/#comment-16795</link>
		<dc:creator>Lespaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phinphanatic.com/?p=15167#comment-16795</guid>
		<description>@ranadicus Your right, stats are there for an overall comparison and a way for coaches/teams to evaluate production over time. They sure don&#039;t tell the whole story depending on how they are factored. Game film fills in the gaps...hard to LIE when its on tape. Not sure I would toss these guys yet considering the pedigree of the backups. Maybe they can play an entire season without injury and we can see if hey are worth keeping.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ranadicus Your right, stats are there for an overall comparison and a way for coaches/teams to evaluate production over time. They sure don&#8217;t tell the whole story depending on how they are factored. Game film fills in the gaps&#8230;hard to LIE when its on tape. Not sure I would toss these guys yet considering the pedigree of the backups. Maybe they can play an entire season without injury and we can see if hey are worth keeping.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 7/14 queries in 0.045 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 593/597 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: phinphanatic.com @ 2013-06-19 10:20:30 by W3 Total Cache -->