Miami Dolphins Preview: Backup QB

facebooktwitterreddit

Matt Moore must be getting tired of the yearly backup quarterback battle. But another Miami Dolphins training camp ultimately means another competition for the right to hold the clipboard and see if one of the 46 sacks Ryan Tannehill averages means a chance to play.

This camp’s matchup is between Moore and once promising young quarterback Josh Freeman. Moore has left all who challenged for his second string role behind Tannehill in his wake, but does Freeman’s skillset make him the ideal backup QB in Lazor’s offense?

2014 Review

Well, both these guys have done nothing for the past two seasons. Freeman wasn’t even on an NFL roster in 2014 and played a combined four games in 2013 for Tampa Bay and Minnesota.

Moore has been Tannehill’s backup since 2012 and, if nothing else, Tannehill has proven he can take a licking but keep on ticking. This means Moore has played a combined five regular season games since 2012.

So without a recent body of work to go by. Let’s break down their career numbers.

Freeman was outstanding for Tampa Bay for the better half of four seasons. He threw for over 3,000 yards in three of his four seasons as a Buc as well as 25 and 27 touchdowns in 2010 and 2012 respectively.

Freeman’s drawback though is he turns the ball over. Frequently. In his career, he has thrown 67 interceptions and fumbled the ball 25 times in just 61 games. Those numbers are outstandingly bad.

Moore, on the other hand, has never really been a starter. His best season was his 2011 campaign with Miami that saw him usurp Chad Henne’s starting position. That was the only season in which Moore has played more than nine games.

2015 Preview

Moore has done this before. He’s sent guys like Chad Henne, David Garrard, Pat Devlin, Brady Quinn and the like packing. He has a handle on the offense and is the consummate professional. He, by all accounts, is likely penciled in as the backup.

It’s Freeman that has to prove himself out of the gate. He has to show the coaching staff that he is clearly the better choice to make the team.

Yes, make the team. Does it make sense to carry both Moore and Freeman? Especially since Tannehill gets up after beatings like Rocky Balboa.

The Dolphins do have another quarterback on the roster, McLeod Bethel-Thompson, who can go on the practice squad while filling the third string role.

So there isn’t a buffer spot for Freeman or Moore. One gets the backup spot and the other gets sent on his merry way.

The cap shouldn’t stand in the way of the decision either as Moore signed a one-year deal this offseason as did Freeman. The Dolphins can get some small relief by cutting Moore and marginal relief by cutting Freeman.

Expected Challenges

Tannehill doesn’t get hurt often and when he does, he’s back the very next game. So getting on the field will be an issue for Moore and Freeman.

Moore is the ultimate backup, the guy the fans want to come in when the going gets tough. His familiarity with the offense should help him throughout camp.

More from Dolphins News

But Moore is getting older (he’ll be 31 when the season starts) while Freeman is 27. Age might play an important role if head coach Joe Philbin wants someone who can run the exact same offense Tannehill does.

It might be asking too much for Philbin and Lazor to ask Moore to run the read option considering his age and mobility. But it certainly isn’t asking much for the coaching staff to demand that of Freeman.

It would be nothing new to Freeman who has 197 rushing attempts and 922 yards in his career. Moore has only run over 50 yards once and three of his seven seasons have ended with him rushing for negative yards.

This will be the interesting debate. What is more valuable to the Dolphins? A backup with a strong grasp on the offense but limited to only some of the playbook or a backup who can run the whole offense, but has some major ball control issues.

Final Verdict

Unless Josh Freeman turns in a camp performance similar to his 2012 campaign with the Bucs, Moore is the backup.

It’ll come down to Moore’s familiarity with the offense and the coaches’ trust in him should Tannehill get hurt.

Freeman has all the tools to be a great backup for Tannehill, he even has the ability to lessen Tannehill’s read option role and fill-in on those plays. But is the trust there? Can Philbin and Lazor trust this guy not to turn the ball over should Tannehill go down?

Ultimately, Philbin will choose Moore and Freeman will look elsewhere for a roster spot. But it won’t be as easy as it sounds. If Moore turns in a poor camp and Freeman plays up to his potential, it’ll be Freeman backing up Tannehill.

What do you think? Who should be the second string QB: Moore or Freeman? Sound off in the comment section below.